Subject: Re: The 2A is obsolete
"States, however, would be perfectly free to ban them if they felt the downside to their populace was not worth the benefit to their militia's readiness."

What's the point?

If the point of laws is to address major problems (can we agree that the ubiquity of high capacity/rapid fire weapons in our nation is a big problem?),
then 50 different rules render all rules useless since a person can easily fill his trunk with machine guns purchased just over the border of an adjacent state.