Subject: Re: The party of Lincoln...
Probably because they employ actual journalists who go out and do research for their stories. They are still a human endeavor, with human fallibilities. But they are still way better than most of your sources.

You mean stellar journalists like the ones who accepted a Pulitzer prize for the Russian collusion hoax? Those guys?

Appealing to Authority and Poisoning the Well are both logical fallacies. When you just complain about sourcing - and especially when citing dubious left wing outfits like many in the mainstream media - you take your eye off the ball.