Subject: Re: New IRS whistleblower backs Shapeley
bighairymike: The IRS and DOJ stood by as the statute of limitations ran out on Hunters $400,000 of 2014 income that he claimed was a loan payment but had no promissory note to back up that assertion.

You do realize there's nothing to substantiate those claims but the whistleblower say so, right? Or do you have evidence that "Burisma booked that $400,000 as payment for an expense"? If so, please provide a link.