Subject: Re: Regional and Small Banks
"Indeed. I wanted to see if you'd moved on from your 3 go-to tactics

1. Change the subject and don't address the thread (Check)
2. Make out of context or false, sweeping generalizations in support of #1 (Check(
3. Never, ever stake out a position on anything (Check)"

That is intellectually dishonest of you. Why do you act so insulting to others by being dishonest with them?

He literally provided numerous links to show where your assertions were factually wrong. He literally addressed each of your points specifically. It is intellectually dishonest to say otherwise.

Here is a question for you to bring it back on topic. You falsely asserted that no one was trying to get Toni Morrison novels banned, you have been shown evidence to the contrary. Do you still believe your assertion is true? Can you acknowledge your opponent's point?