Subject: Re: New IRS whistleblower backs Shapeley
It doesn't have to be indifference. On the IRS side, if they can get the fines, penalties and interest, get the money and... on to the next.

-------------------

The IRS and DOJ stood by as the statute of limitations ran out on Hunters $400,000 of 2014 income that he claimed was a loan payment but had no promissory note to back up that assertion. Burisma booked that $400,000 as payment for an expense (and therefore income to the payee) as it should be. The $125,000 of taxes due but avoided by Hunter will never be collected and Hunter can never be prosecuted for tax avoidance either.