Subject: Re: Instagram and Meta knew
What about requiring a poster of photos of minors to approve every potential viewer?

Does that apply to, say, NBC posting a Young Sheldon clip? GapKids posting their online catalog? ESPN posting stills or video from the Little League World Series? Must we hide away every single child from the public square - absent an express (and certainly unworkably burdensome) "opt-in" process that has to be done individually?

Tying this in (tangentially) to "Atheist" shrewds, this is the path that leads to the burqa and other "modesty" requirements and taboos. In order to avoid the risk that someone might be the object of inappropriate lust from another person, the response is to hide the innocent person - conceal them from everyone and society at large, lest they be the cause of some untoward urges. If there's nothing wrong with a picture of a kid, and the parents want to post the picture of the kid, who are third parties to come in and veto that because somewhere out in the world there are creepy people?