Post #6210 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 10

Sigh, this is what you've got? I don't, which is why I asked for clarification.

You are using an argumentation fallacy; asking for proof of something that, as far as we know, does not exist.

"We know" Trump lied about returning all the classified documents because the evidence is blatant.

We'll never know if there is more Trump is hiding because he's an amoral, obstructing liar. The thing is, he's only being charged on what is known. He is not being charged on mere 'allegations' that are not substantiated by credible evidence.

So far all the QOP seems to have are unsubstantiated allegations.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.