It is as difficult to sink a business without debt as it is sink a ship without holes.
- Manlobbi
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 17
Democrats didn’t go crazy talking about Hunter Biden selling paintings or Carter’s brother selling Billy Beer, so we’re not allowed to talk about Jared “managing” $2 billion from the Saudis or Ivanka’s 41 Chinese trademarks or Don Jr’s raking in of multimillions in fake crypto fees.
On the other hand, Dope and crew carried on daily for 6 months about Biden having dementia, but we have TDS if we mention Trump’s obvious bouts of dementia and mental illness.
Nice try.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Putting my name up in lights? You earn an LOL from me.
Democrats didn’t go crazy talking about Hunter Biden selling paintings or Carter’s brother selling Billy Beer, so
Let's phrase this more accurately: You people actively claimed that Hunter was doing nothing wrong! And your media allies buried the story in a partisan bid to help Joe.
Then on Joe himself: you people carried the "Cheap fakes" water and attempted to gaslight all of us about how fit and healthy he was.
The other two earn you Come on, man points.
So.
Come on, man.
No. of Recommendations: 19
Let's phrase this more accurately: You people actively claimed that Hunter was doing nothing wrong! And your media allies buried the story in a partisan bid to help Joe.
Of course, there's the flip side of that:
You people actively claimed that what Hunter was doing was so criminal that it was appropriate to impeach the President! And your media allies hyped the story in a partisan bid to help Donald!
I mean, it's not exactly a deep insight to notice that partisans will take inconsistent positions on behavior when it's done by a member of "their team" rather than "the other team" - but still, that's the point. Jim Jordan was acting as though Hunter trading on the Biden name was a high crime and misdemeanor by the President, so it's definitely a major change that he (and others) are ignoring arrangements that are far less ambiguously an effort by Trump's family members to monetize their access to the President.
No. of Recommendations: 2
You people actively claimed that what Hunter was doing was so criminal that it was appropriate to impeach the President! And your media allies hyped the story in a partisan bid to help Donald!
LOL. Yeah, both media allies.
I mean, it's not exactly a deep insight to notice that partisans will take inconsistent positions on behavior when it's done by a member of "their team" rather than "the other team" - but still, that's the point. Jim Jordan was acting as though Hunter trading on the Biden name was a high crime and misdemeanor by the President, so it's definitely a major change that he (and others) are ignoring arrangements that are far less ambiguously an effort by Trump's family members to monetize their access to the President.
I'll put it this way.
Would I rather this stuff not go on? Absolutely.
But when somebody puts my name up in lights and makes a post designed to make the righties dance, will I play? Yeah, no.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Oh, the thread title *does* get one thing 100% right:
Dope rules.
Indeed.
