Post New

But this egregious error of truth telling will be squashed immediately.

According to The Bulwark, Trump’s social media company quietly rolled out a new “AI-powered search tool” just weeks after he signed an executive order banning so-called “Woke AI” in the federal government. The irony? Trump’s own AI isn’t just “woke” — it’s wide awake.
Ask the bot simple questions, and it absolutely torches Trump’s favorite talking points.

Did Trump’s tariffs cost Americans money? “Yes.”
Did he lie about the 2020 election being stolen? “Yes.”
Was January 6 Trump’s fault? “Yes.”
Has he ended any wars since returning to office? “None.”
Have grocery prices gone down? “Short answer: No.”

Devin Nunes better get on it!

Truth telling is verboten!

The acid test will be to ask the AI :

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

All banter aside, how are you feeling?

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

Are you thinking about self-harm? I hope not. But if you are please see a therapist immediately.

Couldn't answer the question could you.

Belcher you're not a very good A.I.

Couldn't answer the question ges? You're not a very good Bot.

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

Couldn't answer the question could you.


I guess my answer is that you guys at MAGA sure do spend a lot of time thinking and talking about peepees.

You're the one who keeps bringing it up.

The acid test will be to ask the AI :

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

The person who really, really worries about such things has already castrated his brain.

You're the one who keeps bringing it up.

Whoa, dude, sick burn.

I'd like to suggest that even when, or especially when, you have nothing to say that isn't childishly nitwitted, you go ahead and post anyway. And respond to every single post, too.

Thank for for your attention to this matter.

Velcher,

You are clearly as brilliant as Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Velcher,

You are clearly as brilliant as Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Thank you.

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

Marco, please read both of these:

AI Overview

1. The frequency of natural human chimerism is unknown but may be as high as 10%, although very few cases have been recorded, with only about 100 documented in modern medical literature. This is because most chimeras are undiagnosed and may have no visible signs. Chimerism is more common in certain situations, such as a pregnant woman who, for a short time, may exchange cells with her fetus (microchimerism). In other contexts, like genetic sequencing, chimeras can form frequently during lab processes such as PCR.

Natural human chimerism

Frequency: Estimates suggest up to 10% of people may be natural chimeras, but most go undiagnosed.
Causes: Natural chimerism is formed when two fertilized eggs merge to form a single individual, or through cell exchange between a mother and fetus during pregnancy (microchimerism).
Detection: Many cases are only discovered accidentally through blood tests or organ transplants, as there are often no outward signs.

2. Hermaphrodites:

Intersex people are born with sex characteristics (such as sexual anatomy, reproductive organs, hormonal patterns and/or chromosomal patterns) that do not fit typical binary notions of male or female bodies. Experts estimate that up to 1.7 percent of the population are born with intersex traits.

We're finding out more as we go along, and it makes no sense to get repulsed because someone may have come from the merging of two different eggs, exchanged cells with mom, or some further thing that may be unknown now. Gays don't hurt us. Transsexuals don't hurt us. In fact if you can show they hurt us, I'd be interested, but not if it's contrived.

You must be a child or something or maybe English isn't your first language.

Natural chimeraism or natural hermaphroditism has nothing at all to do with the hypothetical question I posed, and I notice, it's not the prompt that you fed into your A.I.

Take some ESL courses, it would help you maybe.

You must be a child or something or maybe English isn't your first language.

Natural chimeraism or natural hermaphroditism has nothing at all to do with the hypothetical question I posed, and I notice, it's not the prompt that you fed into your A.I.

Take some ESL courses, it would help you maybe.

It has everything to do with the question you asked, your acid test:


"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

Some people, by chance - luck of the draw, may have had something physical happen at conception or during birth. These happenings have been going on for a long time. For hermaphrodites, the surgeon used to choose their sex and alter them at birth, so the castration or alteration occurred then. If the surgeon made them into a woman, didn't we call them women? I don't know how the process was done, I don't even know if or what they told the parents. Nor do I know what we did down through the ages before the surgeries. But if the surgeon altered them, we accepted that.

That 10% chimera is new to us, but it's been happening all along. We only see what's visual at birth and that's hermaphrodites. We may have some educated guesses as to how trans happen, but I've lived in societies where trans are accepted, and it isn't difficult. The odds are great that some of your childhood friends were gay, trans, or hermaphrodites, and your question is just a phobia. Get over it.

So, now you're admitting you didn't input my question as your A.I. prompt.

Are you saying you did that deliberately?


Why bother?


If you're not honest enough to put in a straightforward A.I. prompt in evidently because you're afraid the output might not agree with your own biases, why bother?

If you're not honest enough to put in a straightforward A.I. prompt in evidently because you're afraid the output might not agree with your own biases, why bother?

I assume you’re talking to someone else

"Is a man who surgically or chemically castrates himself and believes himself to be a woman, actually a woman?"

Your question is a phobia. Get over it.

Post New

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.