Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |
Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: The age problem
Date: 04/29/2024 6:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Would you be willing to vote for a Republican you despise for President, if the Democratic candidate had been credibly accused of a crime?

The democratic party has demonstrably rejected and prosecuted democratic suspects and proven miscreants promptly(Al Franken and Gary Hart come to mind) .

This Minnesotta state rep has been sidelined from her committees for suspected burglary of her stepmothers house (supposedly wanted her Dad's ashes, photos, etc).
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/min...

Now consider the time it took for the ouster of George Santos, or Trump's pardoning of convicted thief Duncan scumbag Hunter, or the cotinued embrace of thief/arsonist Darryl Issa.

Anecdotes aside, Trump has a string of lost fraud lawsuits, a rape lawsuit, and a spectacular string of credible allegations, lies, reprehensible behaviors. Rejecting him isn't simply a matter of partisan 'despising'.

So, if the choice was Trump or a "Democratic candidate <that> had been credibly accused of a crime?", unless the crime was worse than the sum of Trump's C.V., it'd be the Democratic candidate, no doubt about it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds