Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: wzambon ✶🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD   😊 😞
Number: of 55803 
Subject: Re: Lindsey, you got some 'splaining to do
Date: 09/26/2025 1:48 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
If the case was as weak as the others in the prosecutor's office had believed, what would have happened if the Grand Jury had refused to issue an indictment? The speed that the Grand Jury acted, would indicate an open and shut case.


Prosecutor to Grand Jury:

Here’s our evidence. But we’re on a timeline. The statute of limitations runs out in four days and the president is very eager to prosecute this case. He’s already fired one prosecutor and has promised to make life difficult for anyone who stands in the way. Anyway-a true bill from you isn’t a conviction. You can let a jury sort it out.

Highly irregular?

What about this case is “regular”?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds