Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (144) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: WHY does Israel have to wait for
Date: 08/13/24 12:21 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
You guys do realize that Iranian-backed terrorists have been firing live war shots at our destroyers and other ships for months, right? How many times are we going to allow that?

We're not. We've been attacking the terrorists directly - we've been firing live war shots at the Houthis in Yemen for months also. Again, the issue isn't whether there will be proxy fighting. The issue is whether the US is willing to change the fighting from a proxy conflict to a direct one.

The time has long past to first level the launchers and eliminate the Houthis who are doing the rocket firing.

Yep, we've been doing that. Us and the British. For example:

defense.gov - US UK launch strikes against houthi targets in yemen to protect red sea shipping

Who threatened to sink anything?

That was the post I was responding to - BHM asked what would happen if a President Trump told Iran that they had to move the Behshad or they would lose it. I told him that they would ignore that threat to sink it. They would certainly ignore a "signal" or "message" that was even less direct than a threat. We're willing to attack the Houthis in Yemen. We might even assassinate an Iranian military commander as a direct military target. But we're not going to sink an Iranian ship in international waters.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (144) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community