Please be respectful of others' privacy, and avoid sharing personal information or sensitive content without their permission. If you are unsure if something is appropriate to share, ask for permission (use the 'Privately email' option when replying to their post) or avoid sharing it altogether.
- Manlobbi
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
No. of Recommendations: 1
Going through the last 20 years with a focus on the seasonal indicators, especially for a 529 account that only allows 2 trades per year.
I saw the rules laid out by Mungofitch and saw that he used the 5 and 17 EMA.
But then I found some links pointing to a 10 & 42 EMA.
1. What's the difference?
2. Has the seasonal effect still been working?
No. of Recommendations: 5
Navigating a 529 account with the Bear Catchers require a much higher degree of finesse.
Because of the additional constraint the account imposes - ie limits 2 trades /per year. And MORE IMPORTANTLY the prospect of a 10 Yr ( avg) fixed time horizon - you typically want the account allocation to meet the College expense threshold and switch to a very conservative allocation ( for most its the Vanguard Defensive/Safe) about the Senior year.
Yes - the prospect of a simple Seasonal switch is tempting - ie hold the Bullish months and stay out the softer months - but over a LT both periods have a positive expectation.
I once many years back ran a Spreadsheet to simulate ranges of outcomes for my daughter's 529 .... a few pointers
(1) The KEY to understand is the 2 components : Your regular/monthly contributions - and their allocation. [ This you have very good control and practically no limit other than monthly switches]
And the total account balance which is subject to the 2 rebalances /yr rule.
(2) NH-NL is the FASTEST of all bear catchers - by DESIGN. While DBE is the SLOWEST - ie most delayed of them
IIRC - A DBE type exit combined with a NH-NL rising strategy was the most appropriate. This was you DONT rebalance often - Only when the perceived risk is high enough.
While you can use the status of the NH-NL can dictate your new funds. I dont think they necessarily beat out B&H - but would have put you on better Probabilistic outcomes in terms meeting the College goals - eg If you were unlucky enough to Start in 1997-98 and needed it 2008-2009 - you would have been taken to the cleaners with B&H.
Because there's a POINT OF INFLECTION in this also - initially your contributions matter the most and then as you are coming close to the impending need - the balance.
A 529 is actually a Defined Target/Maturity Balanced Equity strategy - the constraints make it a much HIGHER COMPLEXITY problem.
Hope this helped!
No. of Recommendations: 0
BTW most fund managers have realized this and have options of Target Dating - ie they automatically switch from Aggressive Equity to Balanced Bond and then Stable Value as it closes on target date of need.
That being said - that is simply a better risk optimized B&H - if you use Bear Catchers etc - YOU WILL/SHOULDN't use them - because your premise is to do Risk ON/OFF - so you want to be FULLY AGGRESSIVE when Bullish and fully defensive when not.
Hope that made sense!
No. of Recommendations: 0
It does. She's a sophomore in college and received a full academic scholarship. She uses 529 to pay for living expenses and will save the majority for grad school.
Used NHNL in 11/21/to go to cash and with bull switch been thinking about what to do next. Don't want to miss out in PY3 but have to think about only 2 trade limit.
Thanks for your advice. Food for thought.
No. of Recommendations: 1
You actually have a COMPLETELY different problem.
Conservation of balance should be paramount really - but one cant dictate risk appetite for others.
FWIW ..... My daughter's is completely switched to safe since she's a freshman. While on the other hand we have a UTMA brokerage - and much better control over it. Which is what I used for BCC switching.
In your case I think you should cover for first year of Grad school expenses. Which gives you a 3+ year horizon.
The balance if you utilize to switch as Risk On/Off - provides you with a cushion as well opportunity for future returns.
Does that make sense?
best
No. of Recommendations: 1
Yes it does. I've thought of treating her as a high school sophomore since we are looking at 2.5 years away until grad school.
She's built a substantial sum and preserving her wealth seems to be the wisest course of action since there's a limit to the number of switches available.
Once I have a clearer picture of where she's headed then I can decide on what to do next.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
