Post #22712 by ptheland on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (66)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

I'm all for fact-checking.

Real time fact checking is a non-starter this time.

One candidate has proven failed fact checks don’t matter to him or his supporters. And the very few undecideds already know he lies a lot. But even just one or two failed fact checks would hurt the other candidate.

With such a mis-match of consequences, there’s no reason for Harris to suggest it or agree to it.

—Peter

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (66)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.