Post #16950 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (18)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Then there should have been no problem for the Judge to grant the extra sixty days

Again-there is just no good reason for delay other than its advantageous to Trump. The judge is doing just fine.

A change of venue was in order but denied. No good reason to change it, and yes I read what you wrote. That's not good enough, after all, he has his 10 strikes and just needs to convince one juror there's a reasonable doubt.

A recusal was in order Nope. Not good enough.

The charge itself Has the USSC ruled against it?

The gag order applying only to the defense. And proven deserved multiple times.

The original point that the timing of the trial was political. You never even made a prima facia case, but if you did a luxury liner could be steered through it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (18)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.