Post #125 by Manlobbi on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

and the only way to monetize it would be to sell of the search rights; so what does that really solve?

I agree.

I suppose the thinking is that it is similar to when traditionally breaking up other monopolies in the past. It isn’t a problem for the parts to be monétised but they they should be not in the hands of one owner.

But as you say only the likes of Meta, Microsoft, etc, would be in the position to buy chrome, risking another search monopoly.

The anti-monopoly case could be to limit buyers, but then they would hugely lower the sale value and argued as deemed unfair.

Fascinating nuances.

- Manlobbi

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.