Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (88) |
Author: MisterFungi   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: The second American revolution
Date: 02/25/25 5:42 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
BHM: "The best way would be to win elections by offering a platform that main street voters will find attractive. This would require dropping the fixation on gender and identity politics, supporting the common sense view that biological males should be kept out of women's sports and out of their bathrooms and locker rooms, opposing sanctuary states and cities to name a few, agreeing that schools should embrace parental rights concerning the education of their children, especially opposing schools keeping secrets from parents. To name a few."

Every one of those "issues" was manufactured and focus-group tested to appeal to your amygdala. They have zero to do with the primary responsibilities of the President of the United States, which are to ensure our national security and promote the welfare of our citizenry. With respect to those genuinely central issues, your guy has done more in the past few weeks to undermine our national security than Putin has in the last decade. And the only welfare in which he and his gang of C-list appointees are interested is their own.

As for the sensible opposition, they should focus, first, on preventing global catastrophe. Then, should we succeed in keeping things under reasonable control for the next 18 months, we'll be fine. Reality bites, and it will bite Republicans hard. Trump voters didn't vote for prolonged inflation fueled by stupid tariffs and even stupider deportation of millions of law-abiding immigrants who provide our food and repair our homes. They didn't vote for gutting Medicaid in order to fund tax cuts for billionaires. They didn't vote for measles epidemics or $300 insulin. They sure as hell didn't vote for literally the richest man in the world trying to throw thousands of VA staffers, Medicare clerks, passport processors, and natural disaster first-responders out of jobs.

Assuming we can succeed at forestalling World War III, we'll be fine.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to MisterFungi here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (88) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community