Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: rayvt 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 6131 
Subject: Re: Overlaps GTR1 backtest is flawed.
Date: 06/17/26 11:07 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
I realize that it was simpler if I preprocessed the GTR1 data.

There were 56 holding period with 0 stocks held.
The gains of those periods ranged from 0.000017 to 0.005907, average 0.002565768
That would be an average annual return of about 4.68%.
Right in the range of 1 year Tbills.

There were 531 holding period with 5 stocks held.
The gains of those periods ranged from -0.411386 to 0.005907, average 0.009678855
That would be an average annual return of about 17.66%.

Number with negative gain: 227. Positive: 304

Average of the positive periods: 0.080548464
That would be an average annual return of about 147.00%.

Average of the negative (loss) periods: -0.085230225

Note: to get the average annual return accurately you'd have to compute the weighted average instead of the simple average. These are the simple average.

The weighted average number of stocks held was 3.2 stocks.

------------------------------------------------------
Compare the common periods where the overlap was 5 stocks, to
the overlap screen and the RS-only version of the overlap screen.
If the supposition is correct, then the holding period return of each such date will be the same, because the same 5 stocks are in each of the three screens.

There were 528 5-stock periods.
The differences ranged from -0.009651000 to 0.000075000, average -0.000166063.

Annualizing to 0.30% average difference.

Conclusion: Overlaps screen as backtested CONFIRMED.

========================================================

Here are the statistics for each of the screens.
Overlap   Avg       Min       Max
CAGR: 31.21 26.84 37.44
TR: 9,233,258 1,638,552 43,318,768
MDD: -75.80 -86.89 -60.25
UI(20): 26.45 21.07 32.21

RS only Avg Min Max
CAGR: 27.47 26.14 29.99
TR: 2,114,014 1,308,032 4,461,812
MDD: -73.07 -81.88 -63.65
UI(20): 24.25 20.19 29.71

HL52 only Avg Min Max
CAGR: 28.80 26.76 31.18
TR: 3,303,037 1,596,815 6,461,678
MDD: -71.93 -84.21 -58.27
UI(20): 21.86 17.68 27.42

The "only" screens were done by changing the overlaps rule from one each to both the same.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to rayvt here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 6,115 posts about Mechanical Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Dividend investing · 52 recs · 2025
Non-Mag7 screen · 34 recs · 2025
OT - Div yields and returns · 32 recs · 2024
Using AI to generate backtesting programs · 30 recs · 2025
Rankings for 19Dec2022 · 29 recs · 2022
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community