Post #6230 by ges on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

The argument for using it to keep Trump off the ballot: The Constitution is clear and the evidence is clear, proponents say: Trump led an insurrection to undermine democracy after swearing an oath to protect the Constitution. 'If the public record is accurate, the case is not even close. He is no longer eligible to the office of Presidency,' two conservative legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, wrote in a law review article that kicked off this debate. WAPO

But then, as Romney pointed out, the MAGAs don't care about the Constitution.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.