Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (65) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86257 
Subject: Re: JediPunishment France
Date: 09/30/26 11:16 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
That means pandering to the max and that means buying votes with taxpayer dollars. Ergo any extra coin collected goes toward expanding unaffordable things, not curtailing them.

I certainly agree that fiscal responsibility has no built-in constituency. Both parties would rather devote resources into things that buy immediate love from voters: cutting taxes or increasing government services. Raising taxes in order to not provide more services is an unloved prospect.

But at some point, when the crisis has become acute, we run out of options. When the Congress is forced to choose between cutting benefits or raising taxes.

That's where I disagree with you, I think. In that situation, Congress isn't going to cut Medicare or Social Security. They'll raise taxes instead. So when you say:

There's no universe where a ruling democrat party takes additional tax money and applies it to solving fiscal problems.

...I think that's wrong. In a universe where the fiscal problems are so intense that they can't be ignored or put off anymore, then a governing Democratic party would choose to raise taxes rather than cut SS or Medicare.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (65) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community