Post #22719 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Not just because of this, but things like this...

"Wray testifying before Congress: with respect to President Trump, there is some questions about wheter or not a bullet or shrapnel hit his ear.

FBI, clarifying Wray’s, “What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject's rifle.”

-----------------

First of all, the FBI should know and not speculate. Second of all, they hang with a shrapnel possibility (from a bullet fragment, not the shattered teleprompter which of course a shattered teleprompter could easy be checked in two minutes and ruled in or our. Why is a shrapnel alternative explanation so important, so important to lie about?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.