Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48474 
Subject: Re: Trump on Tape w/ Classified Docs
Date: 06/02/2023 9:05 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Hillary! did all of those things.

You keep saying that - but you still haven't pointed to anything to suggest that Clinton was the one who initially removed the information from the SCIF, which is one of the things you list. The IG report on the matter actually suggests otherwise. It generally describes the classified information as being in emails that were sent to Clinton, not originating with her:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/14/politics/read-doj-i...

...which is one reason why Clinton wasn't charged with violating Section 1924. And the main reason why Trump is not going to be charged with violating it, either. There's no evidence that he removed those classified materials from their original locations, and it's very unlikely that he personally did it. Since being the one to remove the documents is one of the elements of that crime, and since neither he nor Clinton can be proven to be the one that removed the documents (and almost certainly weren't), neither of them is chargeable under Section 1924.

Albaby
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds