Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (39) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84357 
Subject: Re: To infinity and beyond
Date: 04/30/25 4:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Minor quibble. That is the distance to Promixa Centauri. To my knowledge, we don't know if there are habitable planets there. Proxima B is within the "goldilocks" zone, I believe. But we haven't had any measurements consistent with an oxygen atmosphere (and it would be foolish to send people there without confirming they could at least breathe).

It's super unlikely we would ever find an earth-like planet that's close enough to be reachable with less than faster-than-light transportation and have an oxygen atmosphere. I think any discussion of extraplanetary colonization has to start from the premise that there won't be a breathable atmosphere.

The huge advantage of Proxima B is that it's estimated to have a mass of about 1.07 Earth, which means it solves the one biological problem that can't be solved by any technology we have today - gravity. Many of the hazards to human life in space are environmental dangers like radiation, extreme temperatures, lack of breathable atmosphere. But those can mostly be solved by building a habitat underground, which shields against most of that. But the one thing you can't solve for is low gravity, like you would have on the Moon or Mars. Our entire physiology is based around the presence of Earth-normal gravity, and it takes a ton of very intentional and specific exercise by adult astronauts to keep their bodies from falling apart in zero-G. It's hard to imagine what would happen to a baby growing up in a low-G environment.

That's probably the biggest barrier to near-term space colonization: it's probably impossible for babies to grow to maturity in a healthy way anywhere that isn't close to Earth-normal gravity.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (39) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community