Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: Steve203 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: mitigating the price of oil
Date: 03/03/26 10:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Did not see anything on the wire, other than insuring tankers at US taxpayer expense.

Resorted to the net sifter. Found an interesting nugget at the end.

As of March 2026, the Trump administration is implementing a plan to mitigate rising oil prices caused by Middle East conflicts by increasing domestic production ("drill baby drill"), providing federal insurance/naval escorts for tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, and potentially waiving environmental rules to lower fuel production costs.

Key elements of this strategy include:

Securing Supply Lines: President Trump ordered U.S. naval escorts and political risk insurance for oil tankers in the Persian Gulf to counter surging war-risk premiums.

Boosting Domestic Output: Energy Secretary Chris Wright is managing a program to increase U.S. oil production to offset global shortages.

Regulatory Relief: The administration is considering waiving summer gasoline volatility rules and expanding access to higher-ethanol fuels (E15) to reduce pump prices.

Leveraging "Energy Dominance": Officials believe high domestic production levels allow the U.S. to take aggressive foreign policy actions (e.g., in Iran) without causing massive, sustained price spikes for Americans


Yup. All good for US big oil. Subsidized insurance. Deregulation. Increased production rates, so big oil can profiteer from the war disrupting the production of others.

And the "energy dominance" thing I picked up on at the convention, nearly two years ago.

Steve

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community