Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: <i>But I don't think the Dems have the
Date: 02/17/24 6:43 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
They aren't illegal if they are requesting asylum, which most are.

Russia and China? There was a surge of Russian asylum-seekers after Putin invaded Ukraine. They were afraid they were going to get drafted. In fact, I think some of them had been but ran instead. So, yeah...I would have expected a lot of Russians over the past couple of years.

And do you have to ask about the Chinese? Their society is horrible about human rights. So I'm sure many try to request asylum. Whether it's granted in a different question. Most asylum-seekers either don't pass the initial interview, and don't win in court.

The wall was a stupid idea. In most places along the border you can't actually build the wall on the border. For example, the Rio Grande (can't build it in the middle of a river). And if you build it on our side, then the asylum-seekers are in US territory if they get to the wall, and have the legal right to request asylum. So it's utterly pointless.

You have to change the law, which the Lankford group was trying to do, but Trump shot that down before anyone knew any details. It's questionable whether the restrictions that have since come out would have been in accord with treaties about refugees, as albaby explained in detail. But it's moot since the law isn't going to change, and so an unlimited number of asylum seekers will have to be processed. There is no legal way to stop them.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community