Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 16
Another interesting take on this fascinating topic...
"One final comment on the record share repurchases in 2022.
A trillion dollars in shares repurchased bought 2.8% of the S&P 500's $36 trillion average market capitalization during the year.
However, shares outstanding shrank by only 1.1%.
What happened to the remaining 1.7%? That's the dilution that comes with CFOs telling investors to ignore share-based compensation because it's not a cash expense. Fine.
Here's an idea. How about ignoring share-based compensation but running the money spent buying shares through the income statement as an expense, but without the tax benefit? Pick your poison, pirates.
You can't have it both ways. Suggesting that executives are pirates is too harsh and unwarranted?
At least 40% of S&P 500 aggregate net income over the last two decades has not been used for outside shareholder benefit, but instead was paid to management.
Makes 2 and 20 look like a discount. There is a better word than pirates, but this is a G-rated letter. Speaking of which, I need to schedule my colonoscopy.
These pirates don't know which end is up."
And as we all know, when the next market crash/crisis hits and stocks are actually cheap all the buy backs will abruptly stop...
as CEOs tell us, "We must preserve cash in these uncertain times! Buybacks will resume when our stock is once again clearly overvalued!"
What a racket!
No. of Recommendations: 1
"What happened to the remaining 1.7%? That's the dilution that comes with CFOs telling investors to ignore share-based compensation because it's not a cash expense."
Yet another reason to own undervalued BRK in lieu of an overvalued S&P 500 in a likely future environment of low equity returns.
No. of Recommendations: 6
Put the cherry on top of the cake. Corporate grifters often reprice their options lower, after sell offs. Heads they win, tails we lose.
No. of Recommendations: 20
'At least 40% of S&P 500 aggregate net income over the last two decades has not been used for outside shareholder benefit, but instead was paid to management.'
Praise to Warren and Charlie who have achieved their enormous wealth in BRK proportionately and alongside other owners, never ever taking Any unfair advantage and making peanuts of $100K/ year. They have indeed taken the lonely high road & spun a seamless web of deserved trust that will last. Grateful to be an owner!
No. of Recommendations: 10
<Praise to Warren and Charlie who have achieved their enormous wealth in BRK proportionately and alongside other owners,
never ever taking Any unfair advantage and making peanuts of $100K/year.
They have indeed taken the lonely high road & spun a seamless web of deserved trust that will last. Grateful to be an owner!>
Amen to that!
Mr. Buffett's $100,000 salary hasn't changed in more than 25 years, according to the company.
Berkshire reported that Mr. Buffett's annual compensation is just 1.87 times that of the median pay of its employees, which is $53,510.
And BTW, Mr. Buffett also reimbursed Berkshire $50,000 for personal expenses such as postage and phone calls.
