Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: Aussi 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 77800 
Subject: Re: 2008 vs the Future
Date: 11/04/24 12:32 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
The balance sheet is now 4.25 times as big as it was then, so that would be roughly equivalent to deploying $195bn these days.

Yes, the balance sheet is much bigger, however, has the mindset of the people making the decisions also change to allow a deployment of $200B when the world is crumbling. Obviously, I do not know but my guess is that a CEO in excess of 97 years old (it will not happen soon as it will take time to evolve) who would naturally be concerned about putting his successor in a perilous position, or a new CEO will struggle to fully take advantage of the situation. Perhaps there is a plan and a list that when current $100B market cap companies fall to $25B they will swoop in to purchase or help. However, I do not see $200B being deployed in a GFC type crisis.

Aussi
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds