Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 5
...and how many hundreds of millions of dollars will they have to pay the Bidens for lying about them?
On the Sean Hannity show alone, Hannity ran with informant Alexander Smirnov's claims in at least 85 separate segments last year, including 28 monologues, calling president Biden "compromised," claiming he committed "public corruption on a scale this country has never seen before," accused him of “extortion,” “money laundering, tax fraud, not to mention racketeering,” and "treason," which "could doom Biden's presidency."
And how many hundreds of segments did Fox News run on Hunter Biden using these lies?
Connections between James Comer, Chuck Grassley, and Fox News will also be interesting, as well as finding out exactly when Comer learned that Smirnov was lying. Did Comer know or suspect that Smirnov was lying but continue to promote the allegations despite knowing they were lies?
If this were a just world, some republicans and Trump cultists would soon be gaining a better understanding of the phrase FAFO.
No. of Recommendations: 2
On the Sean Hannity show alone, Hannity ran with informant Alexander Smirnov's claims in at least 85 separate segments last year, including 28 monologues, calling president Biden "compromised," claiming he committed "public corruption on a scale this country has never seen before," accused him of “extortion,” “money laundering, tax fraud, not to mention racketeering,” and "treason," which "could doom Biden's presidency."
And how many hundreds of segments did Fox News run on Hunter Biden using these lies?
But how many in the MAGA mob will hear the truth? And of those that do, how many will still deny it. It's a cult.
No. of Recommendations: 3
From NYT
As is so often the case, the Republican effort to elevate the story of the bribes was aided by their allies in the conservative media — specifically Fox News and even more specifically Fox News host Sean Hannity. So would Hannity, for the second time in two weeks, cop to an error? Would his colleagues in Fox’s popular prime-time lineup address the abrupt change in the story they had been promoting?
Reader, they would not. There were apparently too many other important stories for them to chase. That's sarcasm in case you didn't notice.
FOX found so many other things to talk about. But not this particularly important news story.
No. of Recommendations: 2
if anyone is connected to Burford, please have them assess the payout and odds here !
with the Dominion precedent, it seems now worth their time. they can throw hannity, comer, and other wealthy pols on top.
