Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: UpNorthJoe   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Trump's Buffoonery is the Plan
Date: 03/27/25 9:24 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
msn.com - Forget the trump administration s buffoonery here s the real crisis opinion

This article makes a lot of sense. Trump hired the most unqualified, on purpose. When these
people screw up big time ( and there will be much more to come down the road ), Trump is their
lifeline, the only thing keeping them out of a jail cell. So they become more loyal to him,
more willing to do anything to help Trump seize more power, by any means necessary, the Law be
damned.

Some snips from artice:

"But doing better does not motivate Ratcliffe or any of the highest-ranking national security officials involved, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and Vice President JD Vance.

Doing better would mean meeting or surpassing certain levels of excellence according to law, the Constitution and standards of professional conduct, as well as accepting responsibility for failure."

"Excellence, however, would stand in the way of their real motivation, which is power. None is qualified. All are willing to say and do anything, consequences be damned. The only qualification was whether they were loyal to Trump, and the best guarantee of that, to paraphrase Hannah Arendt, was whether they were the kind of clowns, idiots and buffoons who might “accidentally text” war plans to a reporter."

"The president didn’t know about the security breach. “I don't know anything about it,” he told a reporter who asked about it for the first time. “I'm not a big fan of The Atlantic. It's a magazine that's going out of business. It’s not much of a magazine. But I know nothing about it.”

Why wasn’t he told? A reasonable guess might be that Hegseth and the others knew they were being careless and didn’t want to tell him.

But that would mean carelessness is a flaw.

It’s not.

Carelessness – or any of the injurious attributes of clowns, idiots and buffoons – is something Trump can trust them. When things go south, as they always do, he can trust them to cling to him more tightly, as by then, he might be the only thing standing between them and a jail cell.

When people talk about loyalty to Trump, they are not talking about it in the positive sense, as if they love him. They are talking about it in the negative sense, as if life as they know it would end without him."
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to UpNorthJoe here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community