Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (31) |
Author: commonone ✸🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD   😊 😞
Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Putin's Spies
Date: 04/03/2023 4:17 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Dope1: The committee's findings appeared to include detailed criticism of the Clinton administration's policy of loosening high-tech export restrictions as a way to promote trade.

Yeah, gotta' love those "appeared" qualifiers, right?

From your own link:

The Central Intelligence Agency partly disagreed with the Air Force, saying Loral did not give China much useful information. Adm. Joseph W. Prueher, chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, recently said the U.S. launches helped Chinese ballistic missile capabilities "only incrementally, not [by] any quantum leaps."

Cox hinted to reporters at the Capitol yesterday that the Loral and Hughes cases were less significant than other Chinese attempts to acquire restricted U.S. technology. "We were rapidly led to considerably more serious national security problems than the Loral-Hughes cases," he said.

Would I have preferred that Clinton not do what he did? Yes. Would I have preferred that Bush not do what he did? Yes. Would I have preferred that Reagan didn't open up this Pandora's Box in the first place. Yes.

But tell us, which recent president had (mostly) praise for China and Xi?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (31) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds