Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Maple Scan - app to avoid USA Products
Date: 04/11/25 12:15 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 22
People are very bad at assessing very low-probability risks, and I think this is an example of one.
To illustrate, a typical Canadian is far more likely to choke to death during the next few years than to see their country taken over by the U.S. and become stateless. It's not probable - in fact, it's exceptionally unlikely. But it is POSSIBLE. And there's something you can do about it! It's perfectly possible to switch to an all-liquid diet, which would eliminate the chance of this improbable, but life-ending, event from happening to you! And it would likely have far less disruption on your life than the steps necessary to emigrate.


It's entirely reasonable for different people to have different coolly considered estimates of the likelihood of remote outcomes: differences don't mean someone is over or under reacting.


Some of my estimates:

Chances that the US claims dominion over additional territory in the next decade: 10-20%.

Chances of a free-and-fair and constitution-compliant US presidential election in 2028: under 90%.

Chances of US citizens perceived as opponents of the administration being jailed without credible evidence: no comment.

Chances that the US will side with the aggressor in a war of conquest, three separate times: 50/50.

Chances that US financial assets or accounts of non-US persons will be subject to large new restrictions like capital controls, punitive capital gains withholding taxes, or forced devaluation or default: 50/50.
Or 100%, if you count the recent rule for listed LLPs: 100% of the sale proceeds of any interest is now deemed as a taxable gain, regardless of cost basis.

Chances of the US fully honouring Article 5 of NATO if called upon to do so: Under 20%.
(noting that the only time it was ever invoked, the country to whom allied support was provided was the US)

Chances that you personally will get meaningfully detained crossing into the US with a valid visa, and/or have that visa revoked: 1 in 5000??



I'm not angry about any of those things per se, it would be like being angry at the weather. But a little disgusted, and a little stressed at the planning and changes needed to adapt. Bullet proofing my portfolio is taking a lot of time and effort.

Jim

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community