No. of Recommendations: 2
It doesn't matter. If you're in an early primary state (like New Hampshire), and you cast your ballot for one candidate, and later in the primary cycle you wish a different candidate had won your state's primary, you don't get to go back and change your vote. You don't get to "undo" their primary victory, or their allocation of delegates.
Uh, huh.
Name me a single blue state that would put up the least bit of resistance to swapping out the democrat candidate if the situation called for it.
I'll answer for you: None of them will.
No, that's not the obstacle that will present itself. The states that raise objections will be your red and purple states who will immediately disqualify the new candidate from the ballot. The national machine would swing into action, noting that The Will Of The People Was Made Clear At The National Convention and all that.
You keep referring to 'the old system'. What did the old system say about, mail in ballots? There were laws about how those were handled in places like Pennsylvania. Were those laws followed? Were old ways of doing things changed at the last minute?
Spoiler alert: Yes they were.
https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElections/OtherServic...Again, if it comes down to a choice between
Weekend at Bernie's or an emergency Gavin Newsom campaign, the powers that be inside the democrat party will do what their constituents
expect them to do: Find a way to put a potential winning candidate on the ballot.
They'll do it, and every Biden voter on this board will be in full-throated support of it despite what they might say now.
