Post #13699 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

#3 is just good sense. They're here, better to process them more quickly, and remove those ineligible as fast as possible. Really, nobody wants them hanging out for years awaiting hearings. Not Dems, not Reps.

For #2, it's either work permits or welfare. Or detention (which is basically welfare; providing for their needs). They're here legally, so you gotta choose one.

#1 didn't "lock in" anything. There were supposed to be limits, where currently there are NONE. And there will continue to be none now. So the "record levels" will be meaningless. A million people could show up tomorrow, and we'd have to process ALL OF THEM. No limits apply.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (247)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.