Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |
Author: bighairymike   😊 😞
Number: of 48490 
Subject: Re: Tucker Carlson was right
Date: 06/18/2023 1:08 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Low tax states cannot subsidize high tax states.

----------------

Not directly. Indirectly and perhaps too subtlety.

An analogy, let's say the federal government provides a generous tax deduction to people who pay a lot for country club memberships/dues. By the federal government not collecting the associated tax, the deficit is increased, the effects of which are born by all of us.

Most regular folks would condemn that country club deduction claiming rightfully, why should I, who never play golf, provide a subsidy to those who do. Golf is a luxury and if someone finds it worthwhile, fine but let them pay for it.

Same with "luxury" of generous government social spending supported by high state and local taxes. If your locality wants a sweeping set of above baseline government services, fine, but don't depend on a tax deduction to justify the spending to constituent taxpaying voters. Says the local mayor, "Sure $50M for tents for the homeless is a lot of money but the property tax to cover it is only $80 and even that $80 is deductible."
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds