Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48458 
Subject: Re: Paging Dope1, Mike, Righties
Date: 09/12/2024 3:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
We have a federal government that divides power between the Presidency and a bicameral Congress with a filibuster rule in the Senate. The Republicans haven't had a filibuster-proof trifecta since (checks notes) the 1920's. Most Presidents and Congressbeings want to actually achieve things while in office, and while there are some areas where you can do things without engaging the other party, most anything of consequence requires getting enough votes from the other party to get out of the Senate.

This isn't in dispute, and not at all what I'm referring to.
When democrats are in the White House and have majorities of almost any kind in Congress, they tend to get their policies pushed through. When Congress stalls out, democrat politicians find ways to get things done anyway. Does this quote ring a bell:

I've got a pen and a phone, and if Congress won't act, I will.

Establishment Republicans put collegiality with the democrats above good policy; democrats NEVER put collegiality above the policy they want. That's the difference.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds