Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: $899
Date: 05/30/25 5:56 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
Jim, are you aware that you sing you a completely different tune than not long ago?

Necessity is the mother of invention : )

More seriously, there are different issues to consider, which give different pros and cons.

I don't dispute that the US has usually been a great place for capitalists, at least in the past. I did my big divestment for other reasons--I just don't like the notion of investing in a country whose official policy is to take over my home country against the emphatic wishes of its government and population. It's not a reality show, it's the real world.

US valuation levels are an entirely different reason not to want to be a US investor. But not a fatal one. First, this will pass: prices fluctuate. But more importantly, you never see *everything* overvalued. The valuation level of the broad US market is so high that the next N years will of necessity be poor: the same old stream of distant future earnings costs twice what it did not long ago, so you'll end up with half the future earnings for a portfolio starting today. But it's not a problem if you don't invest in the broad US market. I didn't before, and I don't now, so while valuation is a big red warning for indexers, it remains mostly irrelevant to me. I pick stuff that isn't plainly overvalued, no matter where it's based. Even if I were a die-hard US investor, I wouldn't own the S&P at these levels, but there are still lots of individual firms that are attractively priced.

In terms of geography and the attractiveness and hurdles of investing in Europe or elsewhere, the main difference isn't the lack of firms with good prospects, but information. For US equities it's just so much more available, and easily read and compared. As I mentioned, the European firms can't be all bad--I'm sure there are plenty of fine keepers. But it's starting from near zero by comparison in terms of my learning about them, so I don't know very many attractive ones well enough to risk serious money. Yet, anyway. Rationally speaking, I don't expect to be able to read enough to get the market beating results outside the US that I have managed in US equities. There are only so many days, and only so many years.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community