Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84363 
Subject: Re: BLM wants a virtual primary
Date: 07/24/24 4:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Do you think that EO would have stuck?

Don't know. Way afield from my line of work.

Gun to my head, it sure looks like the President can do this. The main relevant section of the Civil Service statute (5 USC 7511) provides:

(b)This subchapter does not apply to an employee—
(1)whose appointment is made by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
(2)whose position has been determined to be of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making or policy-
advocating character by—
(A)the President for a position that the President has excepted from the competitive service;
(B)the Office of Personnel Management for a position that the Office has excepted from the
competitive service; or


Subsection (b)(2)(A) up there seems to pretty clearly gives the President the authority to except positions from the competitive service and the Civil Service protections generally if he determines the position is "of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making or policy-advocating character."

Maybe there's a question about whether that can be done retroactively or not, but it seems like this is a power that Congress gave to the President back in the day, and it's just kind of been ignored until Trump really wanted to use it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community