Post #13045 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

"Required" is a word that only has meaning when there is an entity who will, automatically and without fail, enforce it. What happens if Mayorkas doesn't dive into this with the gusto we are supposed to assume will be there?

I marvel that you pretend you don't realize he's already done it under Title 42. What can you say to a person who 1. doesn't understand the law, 2. That he's required to follow the law and has, 3. The only people defying the law are MAGAs in the form of Abbott, and 4. that he's already done this, so there's no reason - except partisan politics - to doubt he/they would do it.

So basically, you're whole exercise is partisan politics and most likely not something you really believe.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.