Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: Pam Bondi: Trump Pick for Attorney General
Date: 11/22/2024 12:05 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Im not a lawyer and I don’t play one on TV, but there’s a lot more than “follow the law” packed into that little paragraph

Not really. Boiled down, the oath involves an affirmation to follow and protect the Constitution and to do their duty under the law. Since the Constitution is also a law, there's really not anything more there than "follow the law."

The Constitution doesn't say anything about DOJ being independent. And the law doesn't say anything about the DOJ being independent. It's not a legally an independent agency. By tradition there has been an expectation that the DOJ would operate somewhat independent from the White House, but that's not a creation of this oath.

Every other cabinet official takes the exact same oath, and the expectation is that they will follow the policies and directives of the President. None of those other agency Secretaries are expected to exhibit "independence" from the President the way that DOJ has traditionally been expected to do so. But whatever the source of that expectation for the DOJ, it isn't from that oath.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds