Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84351 
Subject: Re: The Brits have...about 25 tanks
Date: 02/23/25 2:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
Russia isn't the real threat.
China is. And NATO needs to arm up, fast.


How does China pose a conventional military threat to Europe? They're on the other side of Asia. Only in alliance with Russia could they pose a direct conventional military threat....so that reduces to (again) defending primarily against Russia. Which is why it is important to inflict a heavy loss against Putin for his foray into Ukraine.

Rather than a conventional military threat, China poses a broader global geopolitical threat through its efforts to gain political and economic advantages in strategically important areas across the globe. It does this primarily through trade, investment, diplomatic and economic arrangements. The way you would counter that is not by "arming up," but by engaging in the same sort of activities to draw other nations into the Western sphere, rather than the Chinese one. The Danes increasing their direct military expenditures, or having the UK field tanks (on an island nation with no land borders?), doesn't help check the Chinese.

Unfortunately, the U.S. is withdrawing from exactly that sort of geopolitical exercise of power, and ceding the entire field to the Chinese right now. If Europe wanted to react to the Chinese threat, they would step up into the vacuum being created by the U.S. in that "soft power" field, not through beefing up conventional military forces - which are primarily useful against countering threats from Russia, not China.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community