Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: commonone 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48473 
Subject: Re: Trump on Tape w/ Classified Docs
Date: 06/01/2023 10:15 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Dope1: LOL. It's clear you don't know the first thing about how info is handled at that level.

As albaby1 has established, you're the one in the dark here.


Dope1: LOLOLOLOL. Do you think that ANYTHING that comes off a spy satellite ISN'T classified TS/TK?

Two points:

1.) First, these were discussions, not photographs, of a U.S. drone strike that was part of a covert program that was "widely known and discussed" in newspapers, online, and on the air.

2.) Second, since these programs were "public," the information could have been collected independently by reviewing news outlets. Ultimately, there was ZERO EVIDENCE Clinton shared or retained anything TS/TK.

As Comey testified under oath, that although material was later "up classified" and determined by the owning agency to be classified, nothing was classified AT THE TIME it was emailed and not a single document had been correctly marked classified.

Dope1: Do you honestly think somebody sits around and hand-stamps TOP SECRET with a big red ink thing...

The owning agency has a responsibility to mark top secret documents top secret. Or do you think someone should know a document buried inside of a dozens-of-messages long email chain is the one that is top secret but unmarked?

And what exactly did the Inspector General determine?

Quoting the Inspector General here:

"There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton believed or were aware at the time that the emails contained classified information. The emails in question were sent to other government officials in furtherance of the senders' official duties. There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton intended that classified information be sent to unauthorized recipients, or that they intentionally sought to store classified information on unauthorized systems.

Finally, no one is arguing that Clinton wasn't careless, she was. But nothing she did was criminal.

Trump taking the documents wasn't criminal behavior.

His potential crimes are:

1. Unauthorized retention of national security documents.
2. Obstruction. In this case, a possible charge that Trump knew he had records that the government was trying to find, and he willfully kept them from obtaining them.

And what is it with you Trump apologists? The guy is under investigation for multiple crimes and currently under indictment for one of them:

1. The New York State business fraud case (civil, not criminal).
2. Interference with the 2020 election results and presidential transfer of power in 2021. That includes the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (including conspiracy, obstruction, and inciting insurrection).
3. Possession of classified documents at Trump's residence in Florida.
4. Wire fraud and money laundering through the Save America PAC.
5. The Georgia election (election violations, racketeering, and threatening public officials).

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds