Post #2634 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

Take your pick. We've covered this.

No we haven't. You cited one statute - and it's one Clinton can't be charged under. Because one of the elements of that crime requires that the person had to have been the one to remove the classified information. From all the publicly available information, the classified info that Clinton had was stuff that was sent to her, not stuff she sent herself.

If what Hillary! did WASN'T illegal, then short of breaking into a secure facility and stealing the info pretty much nothing is.

Many things are illegal but not crimes. For Clinton to have committed a crime, she has to have committed all of the requisite acts to constitute that crime under the defining statute.

I ask again - if you're so convinced that she should be behind bars, what is the criminal statute you believe she has violated?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.