No. of Recommendations: 4
and claiming it is representative of millions.
If it's a cat and it's got spots, it might be a leopard. So it goes with liberalism and da cray-cray.
Like this:
Hannah-Jones decided her daughter should suffer more as Hannah-Jones and her husband settled on using their daughter as a guinea pig in their efforts to “desegregate” public schools because, in Hannah-Jones’ calculation, they could send their resources, donations, and time alongside their daughter into these schools and fight systemic racism.
But there was one glaring problem with this calculus. The school Hannah-Jones sent her daughter to wasn’t actually underfunded or lacking in resources.
As The Manhattan Institute pointed out, PS 307 — the school Najya was sent to — pays teachers on average upward of $100,000 per year. Roughly $50,000 is spent on each student per year — more than the city-wide average. The student-to-teacher ratio 9:1.
By all metrics, this school was actually well funded and resourced. Yet Najya, like many other students, was not getting a return on the investment.
Hannah-Jones chalked that up to systemic racism and segregation.
And again: if she's willing to piledrive her own daughter's education from the top rope, what would she do to everyone else's?
