Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of ETFBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of ETFBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Index Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |
Author: Manlobbi 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 291 
Subject: Re: Small caps vs large caps
Date: 10/11/24 6:09 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
What a marvelously useful insight. I'll be investing accordingly. Of course, it's too much to hope for an equal-weighted S&P 600 index, isn't it?

To cut to the chase, there would be no discernable difference between an equal-weight small cap and the ordinary small cap index. If you, similarly, chart an a small cap index (such as IJR) and an equal weight S&P500 index (such as RSP) together over many decades, then you will find their performance is incredibly correlated (other than the last 3 years in which small caps are particularly out of favour right now, though they will mean revert as just trading at low earnings multiples today - this is an argument to move in to rather than out from small caps right now).

The corollary is that when you moved from the S&P500 (SPY) to an equal-weight S&P500 (RSP), nearly all of the outperformance you receive with the equal-weight index isn't from the equal weight concept itself, but rather from the fact that the large caps are being profoundly de-emphasized (such much so, that the effect is close to removing the largest 5% of the holdings completely from the index).

Those statements above apply at any random time in the past history when considering long-term returns from that average starting point. However, right now is not an average starting point - the situation is more extreme as this chart shows:
firstlinks.com.au - Am valuations returns

Within this diagram, on average in the past, the red line was by definition in the middle of the cluster. Because it is extremely far to the left, it will deviate back to the middle of the cluster at some point in time. Even if it takes 10 years to move to the centre of the cluster, you will receive an S&P500 market outperformance of 5% whilst waiting. If it returns faster than 10-years, then your annual outperformance will be more than 5%.

So it was always a good idea to hold an S&P600 (or even an Russell 2000 index - basically any index that simply avoids the large caps, it frankly doesn't matter which one) instead of the S&P500, but it is an especially good time to hold such a small (or anyway non-large-cap) index right now.

- Manlobbi
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Manlobbi here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 287 posts about Index Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
S&P500 valuations · 31 recs · 2023
S&P500 sales growth & multiple · 22 recs · 2025
Software equal weight - XSW · 12 recs · 2025
Welcome! · 4 recs · 2022
Shrewd Sam vs No-risk Ned · 2 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |


Announcements
Index Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of ETF | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community