Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Mayorkas to be impeached
Date: 01/03/24 4:01 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Mayorkas will never be removed from office. No democrat will, not even if there was incontrovertible video evidence of him/her stealing a Kia in downtown D.C. and then using it to ram into a pot shop for a late night fix.

I agree he won't be removed from office. I don't think the GOP has the votes to even impeach him. Again, no cabinet official ever has been removed - and only one has ever been impeached.

The reason why is fairly obvious. Unlike judges or elected officials, cabinet officials can be fired. Any cabinet official who had actually committed any personal misconduct sufficient to actually support a vote for impeachment would certainly be fired/asked to resign by the President. There's little reason to stand by a cabinet official who's demonstrably done something wrong - you can always get a new person who would come in and do the job the exact same way, but without the wrongdoing baggage.

Mayorkas is being subject to this because Republicans in Congress don't like the way he's doing his job and the way he defended the Administration's policies, not because there's any evidence that he's done anything illegal. There's nothing new about that. In fact, I don't think you could find a single Administration in U.S. history where there wasn't some Department that the opposition party thought was being cocked up beyond belief. But that's never resulted in an impeachment proceeding against the official heading that Department, for the obvious reason that: i) that's not a ground for impeachment; and ii) if the official isn't personally committing crimes, the President can (and likely will) just replace him with someone who shares the same approach to running the Department.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community