Post #17091 by WatchingTheHerd on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 8

Kantanji Brown Jackson just asked Sauer a great question. Words to the effect of

You seem overly concerned about the prospect of a world in which the President fears prosecution for criminal acts while in office. Can we lay an alternate concern on the table? I'm worried about a world in which a President DOESN'T fear prosecution for violations of the law while President when the role of President already has such immense power.

Sauer responded by citing the bogus premise of his core argument, that up until now, the country has operated under a presumption that the President has immunity from official acts during his term. Of course, that has NOT been the assumption of the country since US 2.0 began in 1789. That's only the fractured fairy tale version of history Trump himself thinks he learned from Roy Cohn.

Trump is toast. At least he SHOULD be.

WTH

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.