Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: Manlobbi HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: unified field theory
Date: 04/20/2025 2:19 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
String Theory wasn't a real theory because it didn't make predictions, and wasn't falsifiable.

Indeed, String Theory is a great deal more pseudoscientific than many believe. String theory is rather like a religion that poses as science. Pseudoscientific theories, by definition, frame themself as technical, mathematical or scientific, to give more creditability, whilst still having the two properties that make them completely non-credible - (1) they don't make any predictions (that can be tested), and (2) they are not possible to falsify.

It possible to create any number of theories with 1 and 2 above for a theory of everything. The obvious one is "God did it, but he is, along with his actions, impossible to mere mortals detect, so you can't disprove this".

The trick with pseudoscientific theories is to make sure they are sufficiently technical or mathematical, despite 1 and 2 above, so that those studying the theory get so much involved that they start to miss the forest for the trees, and whilst focussing on the trees become charmed by the ideas within the theory.

- Manlobbi
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds