Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 3959 
Subject: Re: Max CAGR for 3 step Screens
Date: 02/09/2024 8:32 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Jim, Could you list current stocks in your screen?

I think they would be these
HRB SRPT BKNG NSP RCL CNK IBKR ORCL CCL MELI VVV MSI UAL DVAX ENPH STX SE DK LNTH CELH

[See recent post on garbage data from VL this week on prices...with luck it doesn't affect these specific fields]

However, arguably the screen definition has a bug: it really should start with (yes) another starting step to require the ROE and cash fields both to be positive before doing the math.
Otherwise you could pick a firm with a negative equity and negative cash, but the quotient is positive.
(with those two both positive, the sales growth figures will take care of themselves in the sort)

This makes a difference at rank 22 this week (which has negative equity and negative sales growth) so at least it doesn't affect the tickers above.
In the backtest there is a difference in the top 20 picks in 80% of months by adding the positive field check, but the CAGR difference is within statistical error at 0.64%. Unsurprisingly the win rate goes up a bit. Who wants to buy the "wrong" stock?

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds