Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 6131 
Subject: Re: Machine Learning and Mechanical Investing
Date: 08/13/23 3:46 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
I think Machine Learning will soon be applied successfully to stock pricing. I doubt I will be the one who programs this, but am interested in the topic. What effect will Machine Learning have on Mechanical Investing in the next 5 years?

My own expectations:

People have been trying REALLY hard to beat the market for centuries.
Every idea that has been invented has been tried, and there is no shortage of capital to fund the attempts.
All the fancy ideas in the last few decades have been automated, many with very fancy adaptive software methods.
A new type of automation is relatively unlikely to come up with new ideas that work so well they change the landscape.

There are presumably still lots of market inefficiencies to exploit.
I suppose machine learning bots might accelerate wiping out the few remaining obvious ones that still work and are subject to being arbitraged away, if there are any left.
But other than that? Just another player in the market.

I add the phrase "subject to being arbitraged away" because some things aren't.
Momentum is the simplest example: if someone tries to front run a momentum factor, it just adds to the momentum at a very slightly shorter lookback.
The exact mix of momentum strategies that work best will continue to shift, but I can't see any way they can be eliminated by having more participants.
It's probably much the same for the end-of-month effect. When there are more participants it might start (and end) a couple of days earlier, but doesn't cease to exist because of that.

Speaking of well funded quant software projects, I guess we all wish we had invested in the Medallion Fund and been allowed to remain.
$100 invested at the start of 1988 was worth $398 million by 1998...and that's after the shocking fees of 5 and 44 for most of that time.
Allegedly: Average hold period ranging from a-day-and-a-half to a-week-and-a-half, percentage of winning trades around 50.75%.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 6,115 posts about Mechanical Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Dividend investing · 52 recs · 2025
Non-Mag7 screen · 34 recs · 2025
OT - Div yields and returns · 32 recs · 2024
Using AI to generate backtesting programs · 30 recs · 2025
Rankings for 19Dec2022 · 29 recs · 2022
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community