Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 2
No. of Recommendations: 0
The little boy probably learned this kinda stuff from our LIBERAL WOKE schools and teachers.
No. of Recommendations: 0
Either someone put him up to it, or it was photoshopped. Hard to tell which. My guess is photoshop. The sign didn't quite look right. But it was mildly humorous.
No. of Recommendations: 1
mildly humorous.
---------------------------------
Just a chuckle. Looks like the Freedom Caucus is going to shut the Gov down. One analysis is there is a bipartisan agreement but McCarthy won't bring it to the floor because Freedom Caucus will oust his a speaker if he does. Strange times we live in.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Just a chuckle. Looks like the Freedom Caucus is going to shut the Gov down. One analysis is there is a bipartisan agreement but McCarthy won't bring it to the floor because Freedom Caucus will oust his a speaker if he does. Strange times we live in.
The Freedom Caucus isn't going to shut the government down; the democrats' unwillingness to embrace common sense fiscal policy will.
Let's put it another way: Spending yourself into oblivion isn't the default state of this or any country.
No. of Recommendations: 0
Cutting spending will only go so far (not very far). They need to raise taxes. Are they proposing that? (I would be surprised if they were.)
Cutting PBS, or similar, isn't even a rounding error.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Dope: The Freedom Caucus isn't going to shut the government down; the democrats' unwillingness to embrace common sense fiscal policy will.
Let's put it another way: Spending yourself into oblivion isn't the default state of this or any country.
Sorry. I don't see any analysis of any kind in your statement. While I've read various analysis, all of them agree Freedom Caucus is the problem. And they (FC) can easily threaten McCarthy. Somehow there isn't a way to keep them in line. I've read the old way was to threaten their money, but somehow that's gone now. If you have some analysis, post it.
No. of Recommendations: 3
I don't see any analysis of any kind in your statement.
Then you should read it again. You started from a flawed premise that assumes the democrat position is the correct one. I gave you the opposite perspective. By the way, if you're allowed to post someone's opinion I'm allowed to offer mine or someone else's.
There's nothing stopping the democrats from hopping on board with what the GOP is proposing, which is regular order in the budget process.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Fope:Then you should read it again. You started from a flawed premise that assumes the democrat position is the correct one. I gave you the opposite perspective. By the way, if you're allowed to post someone's opinion I'm allowed to offer mine or someone else's.
Lame - as you would say. I would say you are a little slow with lots of ego. I started by saying there is a bipartisan agreement, but McCarthy won't bring it to the floor because the FC will come after him.. If you will get your head out of the deepest darkest part of your body, Matt Gaetz has made mumblings about replacing McCarthy. So were on board with each other, it's just the FC - that's the analysis.
No one is really interested in your uninformed opinion. Get some analysis out there for once.
